Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02623
Original file (BC 2013 02623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02623

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her former spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a 
timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor 
Benefit Plan (SBP).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not aware a form was needed for the SBP annuity after 
their divorce.  It was not until she recently researched the 
program that she learned about this additional form.  Upon 
retirement, her former spouse was told that she would never be 
removed as the beneficiary.  Additionally, the divorce decree 
designated her SBP beneficiary. 

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of the 
divorce decree and marriage certificate.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The service member retired effective 1 February 2008.  Data 
extracted from the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting 
System (DEERS) reflect the applicant and the member divorced on 
26 August 2010.  DEERS also reflects the member remarried on 
12 February 2012.  

The Board has been advised that it should not consider cases 
involving potential disputed claims unless a court of competent 
jurisdiction has ruled in the case or pushes the AFBCMR to make 
a determination in the case.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS recommends denial.  The member retired from the Air Force 
on 1 February 2008.  At the time of his retirement, he elected 
spousal coverage for the applicant, to whom he was married.  The 
applicant and the member divorced on 26 August 2010.  According 
to the final decree of divorce, the member is court ordered to 
maintain the applicant as a former spouse beneficiary for SBP.  
The member did not inform DFAS that he was divorced and did not 
change his election from spouse to former spouse coverage.  DFAS 
was only notified of the divorce upon receipt of this 
application.  

A spouse loses eligibility as the SBP beneficiary upon divorce.  
There is no provision that makes former spouse coverage an 
automatic benefit.  The only means by which the divorced spouse 
can become an SBP beneficiary is if a former spouse coverage is 
elected by the service member or a deemed election is made on 
the basis of a court order.  A court order by itself cannot be 
used to issue coverage.  Although the divorce decree does award 
the SBP to the applicant, there was never a deemed election by 
her, or her attorney on her behalf within one year of the 
divorce.  According to law, DFAS cannot provide former spouse 
SBP coverage without a deemed election from the former spouse or 
her attorney on her behalf within one year from the date of the 
final divorce or an election change request from the member.  

The premium costs for SBP have continued to be deducted from the 
member’s monthly military retired pay.  Based on this 
application, DFAS was required to change his SBP election to no 
beneficiary and refund the premiums from the first month 
following the divorce.  Should the Board approve this 
application; those premiums will need to be collected from the 
members military retired pay account.

The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In response to a request for a Marital Status Affidavit, the 
applicant submits that she is not currently married and that her 
former spouse is married. (Exhibit E)  The member has not 
responded.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.	The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, the applicant has not demonstrated 
that extraordinary circumstances exist that are required for 
this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP 
beneficiaries.  While we do not take issue with the applicant’s 
assertion that her divorce decree ordered her former husband to 
continue coverage for her under SBP, she failed to convert the 
coverage to former spouse coverage within one year of their 
divorce as required by law.  Since the applicant has failed to 
demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances existed that would 
override the failure to effect the former spouse coverage, we 
can only grant the relief sought if the former member’s spouse 
provides notarized consent relinquishing the benefit.  
Otherwise, the applicant’s only recourse is to return to a court 
of law to have the issue decided.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the requested relief.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02623 in Executive Session on 7 August 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02623 was considered:

    	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 May 13, w/atchs.
    	Exhibit B.  Member’s Military Personnel Record.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS, dated 18 Jun 13.
  	Exhibit D.  Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 13.
	Exhibit E.  Letters, SAF/MRBC, dated 9 May 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062

    Original file (BC-2011-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicant’s coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00927

    Original file (BC 2013 00927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to establish former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The opinion states that the Board can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00058

    Original file (BC-2010-00058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE ADVISORY: The AFRBA Legal Advisor recommends denial and states in part that despite the May 03 court order directing the member to convert to former spouse coverage, federal law makes the election unavailable when the deemed election is not timely filed. If there were not a competing eligible beneficiary, the AFRBA Legal Advisor would recommend correcting the record, but there is. The complete AFRBA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04870

    Original file (BC-2011-04870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was a miscommunication; she thought she had one year from the date her former spouse signed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage to comply, not one year from the date of the divorce. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04458

    Original file (BC 2013 04458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His former spouse has been receiving a portion of his military retirement and remained eligible to be the beneficiary of his SBP up until her subsequent marriage. The correct date of marriage is 7 Dec 04. Neither the applicant nor his current spouse dispute the fact that his first former spouse is the rightful beneficiary of the SBP.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03982

    Original file (BC-2012-03982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The former service member may file and election change or the former spouse may request the service member be deemed to make an election on his or her behalf. In the latter case, the former spouse must provide legal documentation the service member agreed, or the court ordered the service member, to establish former spouse coverage. She has not provided any evidence showing the former service member made an election for former spouse coverage within one year of their divorce as required by law.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02265

    Original file (BC-2012-02265.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was also provided an advisory (Exhibit C) prepared by SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. The Board has been advised that it can consider cases involving potential claims by more than one spouse or former spouse if there is evidence that the member or former spouse timely notified the Government within one year after the divorce was final, or if there are extraordinary circumstances that would justify correction of the record. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01101

    Original file (BC-2012-01101.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to establish former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR indicates that since the request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02993

    Original file (BC-2007-02993.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence he submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage during the required time following their divorce. The Agency Legal Advisor indicates that, in his view, the Board has the legal authority to correct the record as requested, especially if it determines the legal requirements to make a deemed election were met. A complete copy of the Legal Advisor’s evaluation is at Exhibit...